It refers to the right to vote, eligibility for election, referendum, and national examination of foreigners who do not have Japanese nationality (not Japanese).
First of all, as a major premise, in Article 15 of the Constitution
"Selecting and dismissing civil servants is a national right."
It stipulates that foreigners are not allowed to participate in the government.
In the government's view on the right of foreigners to vote on June 4, 2010,
The Constitution of Japan clarifies that foreigners are not guaranteed to exercise their suffrage, based on the "rights of national sovereignty."
(I was surprised that the Prime Minister at that time was Prime Minister Hatoyama)
[Scope of foreigners to vote]
(1) Approximately 300,000 foreigners with special permanent residency in Japan (approximately 300,000 Koreans and Koreans, approximately 800 Chinese and Americans, and approximately 1,000 Taiwanese) will be granted suffrage.
(2) Of the approximately 2.9 million foreigners living in Japan (including technical intern trainees), 800,000 are Chinese.
[Significance of the right of foreigners to vote]
① Reflection of various opinions
② Reflecting the opinions of foreigners who pay taxes and receive public services
[Number of submissions of foreign government bill]
Komeito 29 times
Democratic Party 15 times
Communist Party 11 times
Liberal Democratic Party once
As I mentioned at the beginning, the foreign government is unconstitutional.
It goes without saying that the sovereignty lies with the people. It is a national principle.
The country is run by elected members.
In other words, foreigners' intervention in the electoral system directly leads to indirect aggression.
So far, there are about 800,000 Chinese and about 500,000 Koreans in Japan.
The number of people in countries that provide anti-Japanese education is 1/100 of the Japanese population.
Only in China, the National Defense Mobilization Law can force them into military action.
It is obvious that a large number of technical intern trainees will be sent from the mainland if the right of foreigners to vote is granted. It's obvious if you look at the example of Australia. (1.3 million out of 25 million Australians (5.2% Chinese))
The Self-Defense Forces can protect Japan from invasion by force, but cannot respond to such indirect aggression at all.
First of all, I am surprised that the ruling Komeito party has submitted such a bill 29 times, but I am really stupid of the Self-Defense Forces that are shaving day and night to protect Japan.
From a military perspective, I don't understand the meaning of the bill being submitted in the Diet. I can only think that he is doing politics for other countries that have anti-Japanese as their national policy. Is it even trying to take part in the aggression?
－引 用－
E-GOV 法令検索
出入国在留管理庁ホームページ
日本政治.com
MITSUTOMI
Comments